Curriculum, composed.

The course vs. The course of study.

A course is one thing. A school-wide course of study, with scope and sequence across departments, grades, and pathways, is another. The hardest work in curriculum is keeping the two aligned. is the studio where alignment is designed in from the start, and where the evidence is ready whenever someone asks.

Alignment MapCross-Course Coverage
SCI 3
SCI 5
ESCI 6
LSCI 7
Patterns
I
D
D
M
Cause & Effect
I
I
D
D
Systems
-
I
D
M
Energy & Matter
-
I
I
D
Structure
I
D
M
M
Science Dept.5 Cross-Cutting ConceptsI → D → M Progression

Alignment is what makes curriculum curriculum.

A course can be engaging and rigorous, and still not be curriculum. What makes it curriculum is whether it moves learners toward the standards it is designed to help learners to meet. Engagement and rigor aren’t replacements for alignment.

treats alignment as the architecture of course design rather than a review. Standards connect to objectives, objectives to assessments, assessments to activities, materials, and multimedia, all in one place as you build. Because those connections are real, the coverage report already exists. You export it.

One place.
Everything connected.

is an all-in-one studio for curriculum design. Standards, the course of study, objectives, assessments, and lessons live in one model, so alignment is a property of the work.

1

Define Your Standards

Browse and import standards frameworks via CASE: NGSS, Common Core, state standards, or your own. Organize them into outcome sets, ready for alignment.

2

Map Courses to Standards

Use the alignment map to assign standards to courses at Introduce, Develop, or Master stages. Gaps and progressions appear as you work, and the map exports to CSV or print.

3

Author Aligned Courses

Write objectives, then assessments, then lessons, each linked to the parent standard. Alignment is visible as you work.

4

Publish Anywhere

Push to Canvas with a pre-flight check that warns before anything is overwritten. Export Common Cartridge for any LMS. Or print course documents for a teacher’s binder.

Review day should be an export, not a scramble.

Most schools prepare for an accreditation visit by reconstructing alignment after the fact: spreadsheets rebuilt from memory before the reviewers arrive. When alignment is part of the authoring, the evidence accumulates as courses are written. On review day, you export it.

Cross-Course Alignment Map

Every standard against every course at Introduce, Develop, or Master depth, filterable to gaps only. Exports to CSV or prints for the binder. The view accreditation reviewers wish you already had.

Standards Evidence Chain

Each standard traced through course and unit objectives to the assessments that measure it, exportable as a spreadsheet.

Course Health Score

Every course carries a 0–100 structural completeness score with a ranked list of gaps and a Fix shortcut for each. What’s missing is never a mystery.

Printed Course Packet

Course map, syllabus, lesson plans, and a standards trace appendix in one document, formatted for the review table.

The LMS is not a design tool.

Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, and Brightspace deliver courses. None is designed to compose one. is the upstream studio where a course is built. It treats print, PDF, and the LMS as equal delivery paths. Print a binder for a teacher’s desk. Save the packet as a PDF. Push natively to Canvas. Export a Common Cartridge for any IMS-compliant LMS.

Print & PDF: course pack, binder, desk copy
Course Map
Lesson Plans
Test Masters
Answer Keys
Syllabus
Alignment Map
Canvas: native API sync
Modules & Structure
Assignment Groups
Weighted Grading
Pages & Lessons
Assignments
New Quizzes
Discussions
Outcomes & Rubrics
Syllabus
Common Cartridge: any IMS-compliant LMS
Modules & Structure
Pages & Lessons
Assignments
Syllabus
QTI Assessments

Four-Tier Objective Hierarchy

Imported standards break down into course objectives, unit objectives, and lesson objectives. Each level links to the one above and traces back to the framework it came from.

DOK-Aware Throughout

Every objective and every assessment item carries a Depth of Knowledge level, so cognitive rigor is tracked rather than assumed.

Publish to Any LMS

Native push to Canvas: modules, New Quizzes, rubrics, and more. Common Cartridge export covers Moodle, Blackboard, Brightspace, and Schoology. Print-ready documents when no LMS is needed.

AI-Generated Assessments

Criterion-referenced items tied to specific objectives and DOK levels, grounded in your course materials, so questions can’t be answered with a quick search.

Print-Ready Course Documents

Course maps, lesson plans, test masters, and alignment maps, formatted for a binder or a principal’s desk. No LMS required.

Align What You Already Teach

Align any course after the fact. AI proposes standard-to-content links, each backed by a verbatim quote from the course, and your team confirms or dismisses every one. Direct course import from Canvas and other LMSs is in development.

Generated Assessment
Multiple ChoiceDOK 34 pts
Which rhetorical strategy does the author primarily use in paragraphs 3–5 to advance the claim that urban green spaces reduce inequality?
  • Appeal to emotion
  • Evidence-based reasoning
  • Anecdotal testimony
  • Appeal to authority
MatchingDOK 26 pts
Match each literary device to the excerpt from the passage in which it appears.
EssayDOK 410 pts
Evaluate the author’s argument. Identify at least two strengths and one limitation, using textual evidence.

Every item tied to
a specific objective.

generates assessment items that are criterion-referenced to your objectives, targeted at a specific DOK level, and grounded in the materials your teachers use. The result: questions that require rigorous engagement with the content rather than simple recall of searchable facts.

  • Seven question types: MC, True/False, Multiple Answer, Matching, Ordering, Categorization, Essay
  • DOK-targeted: each item tagged with its cognitive level and aligned to a specific course objective
  • Source-grounded: generated from your uploaded materials, not from the model’s training data
  • Full editing control: adjust difficulty, rewrite distractors, add custom feedback per item
  • AI-generated rubrics: criterion-referenced performance levels built from your objectives, pushed to Canvas or included in print documents
  • Exports as Canvas New Quizzes, QTI for any LMS, or print-ready test masters with answer keys

Captivate is Photoshop. Canvas is the printer.
Where’s InDesign?

Authoring tools build content. Delivery systems ship it. What’s been missing is the composition layer, where objectives, lessons, assessments, and standards come together into a coherent course before it ships anywhere. is that layer.

The tool I’ve wanted
for a long time.

After almost 30 years as a teacher, learning designer, Canvas admin, and Quality Matters Master Reviewer, I’ve come to think the hardest problem in curriculum isn’t authoring a strong course, unit, or lesson. It’s holding the standards, courses, objectives, assessments, lessons together as a school’s program grows and evolves. That work deserves a real tool.

is built for curriculum teams who treat alignment as craft. Not as a checkbox for accreditation, not as a report generated under pressure but as the architecture of the work itself. It’s the studio I wanted to build in, through every course I’ve helped design and review.

Joseph Barr
Instructional Designer · Teacher · Canvas Admin · QM Master Reviewer & Founder

Let’s talk about
your curriculum.

Tell me about your school, your course of study, and what you want the next version of your curriculum to look like. I’ll show you how helps you build it, and what the evidence looks like when you’re done.

Get in Touch